The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2016-00355, 3005168196-2016-00356, 3005168196-2016-00357, 3005168196-2016-00358, 3005168196-2016-00359.The hospital disposed of the device.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure for a type ii endoleak using ruby coils and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, the physician advanced another manufacturer's sheath into the patient and inserted another manufacturer's guide catheter through it.The physician then advanced a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) through the guide catheter and attempted to deploy four ruby coils into the aneurysm sac; however, the coils would not advance through the lantern and were removed.Next, the physician decided to replace the lantern with another manufacturer's microcatheter and attempted to advance a new ruby coil through this microcatheter; however, this ruby coil also had difficulty advancing through the microcatheter at the same point as the first two ruby coils and therefore, it was removed.The procedure was completed using another manufacturer's coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|