• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Erythema (1840); Unspecified Infection (1930); Rash (2033); Burning Sensation (2146)
Event Date 12/16/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient was experiencing a sharp pain in the chest that was not related to stimulation.The patient had a recent generator replacement surgery, and the surgeon believed that the patient had an infection on (b)(6) 2016.The surgeon disabled the normal mode stimulation, but the pain continued.The surgeon then disabled the magnet mode and autostimulation mode on (b)(6) 2016.The patient's mother reported a red spot or rash on the patient's chest.She stated that the last time the patient's settings were changed was in the middle of (b)(6) 2016.The patient was also prescribed an antibiotic regimen by the surgeon that was to be completed on (b)(6) 2016.The patient reported feeling burning in his left chest on (b)(6) 2016 and that the area was red and warm to the touch.Chest x-rays were performed, and the surgeon stated that the generator had "shifted a little." clarification was requested, and the notes stated that there was a foreign object next the generator.However, it was discovered that the patient's mother placed the magnet over the generator for the x-ray, which was the "foreign object" that the surgeon saw.The patient's neurologist did not believe that the redness in the chest was related to vns in any way, and he advised against turning off the patient's output currents because the patient had good seizure control with vns.The device history records of the generator and lead were reviewed, and the devices were both sterilized prior to release.Due to the conflicting information, it is not known at this time if the patient has an infection or not.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
It was clarified that the surgeon prescribed the antibiotics prophylactically.There was no evidence other than the redness and pain at the generator site to indicate that the patient had an infection.Also, the surgeon continued to believe that there was an infection because of the "foreign object" in the x-ray that turned out to be the magnet.The neurologist did not think the redness or pain was due to an infection, but most likely due to the patient picking at the site or from something that happened at school.It was also clarified that the generator had not shifted at all.No further intervention has occurred to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5529212
MDR Text Key41260407
Report Number1644487-2016-00648
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/29/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/25/2017
Device Model Number106
Device Lot Number4541
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received03/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/02/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age14 YR
-
-