|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Separation Failure (2547)
|
Patient Problem
Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either (b)(6).Investigation is still in progress.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to article: the patient presented to our institution 20 weeks' post placement for filter retrieval.Pre-retrieval ct demonstrated filter strut penetration.Venous access was acquired through the right internal jugular vein, and an 11-fr sheath was advanced into the ivc.Caval venography confirmed filter strut penetration into the ivc wall and an 8 degrees filter tilt.A 15-mm snare-catheter combination was used to snare the hook of the filter.However, multiple attempts to envelop the snared filter struts into the sheath were unsuccessful with failure of disengagement of the distal portion of the filter struts from the wall of the ivc.The snare sheath of the in situ 15-mm snare was then removed.A 25-mm snare was coaxially introduced over the 15-mm snare, followed by the snare catheter.Patient outcome: this snare-sheath combination was advanced distally over the filter struts, which were then successfully dislodged from the ivc wall and enclosed in the sheath.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog #: unknown but preliminary investigation of imaging showed a cook günther tulip filter and not a g2 filter referred to in description of event.Expiration date: unknown as lot # is unknown.Since catalog # is unknown the 510(k) could be either k090140, k112119 or 121057.Unknown as lot # is unknown.Summary of investigational findings: this complaint is based on the case with a (b)(6) male.The image review demonstrated primary filter leg perforation of at least two legs.Filter perforation of the vena cava wall is a known risk reported in the published scientific literature.Also, published scientific literature describes that manipulation in the area of filter placement could contribute to changes to the filter configuration and placement thereby potentially initiate perforation of the vena cava wall.From the published scientific literature filter tilt inside ivc and/or embedment of filter legs or filter hook in the ivc wall is a well-known risk.Several case reports published in articles, describe successful retrievals of such filters by advanced retrieval techniques.Rpn and lot# are unknown, but there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to article: the patient presented to our institution 20 weeks¿ post-placement for filter retrieval.Pre-retrieval ct demonstrated filter strut penetration.Venous access was acquired through the right internal jugular vein, and an 11-fr sheath was advanced into the ivc.Caval venography confirmed filter strut penetration into the ivc wall and an 8° filter tilt.A 15-mm snare-catheter combination was used to snare the hook of the filter.However, multiple attempts to envelop the snared filter struts into the sheath were unsuccessful with failure of disengagement of the distal portion of the filter struts from the wall of the ivc.The snare sheath of the in situ 15-mm snare was then removed.A 25-mm snare was coaxially introduced over the 15-mm snare, followed by the snare catheter.Patient outcome: this snare-sheath combination was advanced distally over the filter struts, which were then successfully dislodged from the ivc wall and enclosed in the sheath.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|