Model Number 560BCS1 |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 04/20/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that during use, the bio-console instrument experienced back flow and no flow and alarms were heard when transferring to bypass.
The revolutions per minute were increased but did not change the flow.
The flow probe was checked, the line pressure was 225 mmhg, the line was clamped then the hand crank was used.
The instrument was re-started and use of the instrument was continued to complete case with no adverse patient effect.
The customer requested the instrument be evaluated so the field service technician was dispatched.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: the reported backflow was not verified by medtronic field service technician during on-site field analysis.
The reported backflow alarms were confirmed by review of the event log.
The event log data was used to plot revolutions per minute, flow, backflow alarms, and power cycles for the duration of the case as well as post-case instrument evaluation.
Medtronic engineers reviewed the plot with the facility perfusionist.
The event log data shows that the instrument was not re-started following the backflow alarms, but rather the motor was stopped and restarted.
The perfusionist suspects a clamp may have been released with a purge line open causing temporary retro-verse flow when switching to bypass.
This condition was quickly remedied by the user and positive flow was achieved for the duration of the case with no adverse patient effect.
The field analysis and the evaluation of the event log indicate that the bio-console responded correctly throughout the case.
Conclusion: the patient demographics were requested but were not provided by the health care facility.
There was no instrument performance issues noted during post-case instrument evaluation.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that during use the bioconsole instrument experienced back flow and no flow and alarms were heard when transferring to bypass.
The revolutions per minute were increased but did not change the flow.
The flow probe was checked, the line pressure was 225 mmhg, the line was clamped then the hand crank was used.
The instrument was re-started and use of the instrument was continued to complete case with no adverse patient effect.
The customer requested the instrument be evaluated so the field service technician was dispatched.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|