• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 103
Device Problem Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574)
Patient Problem Seizures (2063)
Event Date 04/05/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
Clinic notes were received for patient's prophylactic replacement referral due to ifi=yes.Notes mention that the patient feels the device shocking him similar to when his battery has gotten low in the past and seizures are increased in the last 2 weeks.Additional relevant information has not been received.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the neurologist that the patient has experienced neck pain with stimulation several times when the (vns) battery is weakening.The patent has not had more seizures compared to pre-vns baseline level.There were no known changes to medications, vns settings or other external factors which preceded the onset of the increase in seizures.Patient underwent prophylactic generator replacement on (b)(6) 2016 due to ifi - yes.The explanted generator was received on 06/02/2016.Analysis is underway but has not been completed to date.
 
Event Description
The pulse generator was explanted/returned due to "prophylactic replacement." although the reported allegations of "increased seizures" and "painful stimulation" cannot be evaluated in the pa laboratory setting, proper functionality of the pulse generator in its ability to provide appropriate programmed output currents can be verified.In addition, the septum was not cored, thus eliminating the possibility of a potential unintended electrical current path through body fluids.This was successfully verified in the pa lab.In the pa lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the pulse generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generatoroutput signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The reported allegation of "low battery" was not duplicated in the pa lab.The battery, 2.818 volts, shows an ifi=no condition.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 103
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5660851
MDR Text Key45340739
Report Number1644487-2016-01047
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/22/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/17/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2016
Device Model Number103
Device Lot Number3999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/02/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received06/23/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age29 YR
-
-