• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ASPIRATION PUMP MAX 110V; JCX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM ASPIRATION PUMP MAX 110V; JCX Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PMX110
Device Problems Decrease in Suction (1146); Device Emits Odor (1425); Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2016-00696.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure using an indigo system separator 8 (sep8) and a penumbra system aspiration pump max 110v (pump max).During the procedure, the physician was unable to backload the torque device onto the sep8.Therefore, it was removed and a new sep8 was used to continue the procedure.While in use, the pump max became very heated and emitted a burnt smell.It was also noticed that the pump max stopped producing vacuum throughout the procedure as the vacuum gauge went from -21 inhg down to 0.The physician turned off the pump max to let the device cool.Upon turning the pump max back on, the physician noticed that the pump max was quiet and was not making the usual fan noise.Therefore, the procedure was completed using a second pump max.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Result: there was no visible damage to the penumbra system aspiration pump max 110v (pump max).The pump max was plugged in, powered on, and ran for 30 minutes, and no issues were found.Therefore, the pump max was functional.Conclusion: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the indigo system separator 8 (sep8) original torque device was able to be back loaded on the proximal end of the sep8 delivery wire.Therefore, the root of this issue could not be determined.Evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pump max was functional.The pump max was plugged in and powered on and ran for 30 minutes and no issue was found.The burning smell mentioned in the complaint could not be confirmed.Therefore, the root cause of this complaint could not be determined.Sep8s are 100% dimensionally inspected during in-process inspection.Pump maxs are 100% functionally tested during incoming inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM ASPIRATION PUMP MAX 110V
Type of Device
JCX
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key5669756
MDR Text Key45608831
Report Number3005168196-2016-00695
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JCX
UDI-Device Identifier00814548012773
UDI-Public00814548012773
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122756
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/20/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue NumberPMX110
Device Lot NumberF18683-07
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/16/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/01/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/27/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age92 YR
-
-