• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problems Muscle Spasm(s) (1966); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Cognitive Changes (2551)
Event Date 07/14/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During review of programming and diagnostic history, it was observed that the patient's vns device was testing during an office visit on (b)(6) 2015 and system diagnostics revealed high impedance (dc dc - 6).The device was evaluated again on (b)(6) 2015 and system diagnostics revealed high impedance again on that date (dc dc - 6).No patient adverse events have been reported and no known surgical interventions have occurred to date.Attempts for further relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Event Description
Information received on 06/09/2016 states that the patient was last seen (b)(6) 2016 and lead impedance was ok.The patient has had no adverse events that may be associated with the high impedance.X-rays have not been taken and patient manipulation or trauma is not expected to be related.The physician's office is aware that there may be a fluctuating high impedance issue so the patient was referred to neurosurgery.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the patient's mother that the patient's head had been shaking and that the patient was acting differently.The neurologist indicated that the patient had not been acting the same on her current generator as she had on her previous generator, so she was referred for surgery consult for symptom assessment and a lead check.After the consult, the patient was scheduled for surgery.Per the manufacturer's programming database, high impedance was detected again on this patient's device within the last year.No further relevant information has been received to date.No surgical intervention has occurred to date.
 
Event Description
It was reported through implant card that the patient underwent planned lead and generator replacement surgery due to high impedance and prophylactic replacement.However, during surgery, it was determined that replacing the generator solved the issue.The lead pin was not re-inserted into the old, explanted generator to ensure that the pin was past the connector block with a good electrical connection.No further relevant information had been received to date.The suspect product has not been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5672077
MDR Text Key46724107
Report Number1644487-2016-01093
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/20/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/23/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/29/2016
Device Model Number102
Device Lot Number3938
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received02/23/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/06/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age32 YR
-
-