• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS EMERALD; SURGICAL ADJUNCTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS EMERALD; SURGICAL ADJUNCTS Back to Search Results
Model Number EMERALDC30
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/04/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi #:unknown since lot number was not provided.Age/date of birth: unknown, not provided.Sex/gender: unknown, not provided.Lot # and expiration date: unknown, not provided.If implanted, give date: not applicable as cartridges are not implantable.If explanted, give date: not applicable as cartridges are not implantable.(b)(6).Device manufacture date: unknown, since lot # was not provided.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the surgeon saw fragments of a cartridge, model emeraldc30, was broken in the anterior chamber of the patient's eye after an intraocular lens was inserted.The fragments were removed without any incision enlargement or any delay in surgery.No further information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The cartridge was not returned to the manufacturing site; therefore product testing could not be performed and the customer's reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing records reviews: since the lot number for the cartridge is unknown the manufacturing record evaluation could not be performed.Labeling review: the directions for use, (dfu) instructions were reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions for the proper use and handling of the cartridge.As a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported complaint was not confirmed.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 09/15/2016.Device returned to manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the cartridge was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Visual inspection at 10x microscope magnification showed evidence of viscoelastic ovd (ophthalmic viscosurgical device) residue inside the cartridge tube, indicating the device was handled and prepared for surgical use.Stress marks in both sides of the cartridge tube and tip were observed which are typically caused and/or may well appear by the pass of the iol (lens) through the cartridge.No cracks were detected.The customer's reported complaint was not verified.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMERALD
Type of Device
SURGICAL ADJUNCTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS
santa ana CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS INC.
road 402 north, km 4.2
anasco industrial park, pob 14
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
pam mcclain
1700 east st. andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478243
MDR Report Key5690067
MDR Text Key46257058
Report Number2648035-2016-00834
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSA
PMA/PMN Number
K961242
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/31/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberEMERALDC30
Device Catalogue NumberEMERALDC30
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/30/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-