• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT® PLATINUM NAVALIGN FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT® PLATINUM NAVALIGN FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-FEM-CELECT-PT
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Thrombus (2101); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/27/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4). Model and lot #) igtcfs-65-1-fem-celect-pt. Investigation is still in progress.
 
Event Description
Description of event according to study: on (b)(6) 2015: the inferior vena cava (ivc) diameter at the intended filter location was 24. 0 mm. There was no ivc anatomic anomaly or presence of thrombus in the ivc prior to filter placement. Using the right common femoral vein as the access site, a celectfilter (lot # e3342374) was deployed at the intended location in the ivc infrarenal site and in a location suitable to provide sufficient mechanical protection against pulmonary embolism (pe). The filter neither deployed prematurely nor did the filter jump upon deployment. There was no evidence of filter fracture, deformation, or migration. There was no extravasation of contrast or filter leg(s) appearing outside the column of contrast after filter placement. From the venacavagram, the angle of filter tilt was >
=
16 degrees site report of tilt per post-procedure x-ray ((b)(6) 2015) was 0 degrees. Analysis of the placement procedure venacavagram revealed suboptimal image, unable to provide measurements. There was no ivc anatomic anomaly. Presence of thrombus in the ivc prior to filter placement was unable to be determined. There was thrombus present in the pelvic veins on the right side. The filter placement site was the infrarenal. There was no evidence extravasation of contrast, or deformation. Filter leg(s) did appear outside the column of contrast after filter placement. From the venacavagram, the angle of filter tilt in the ap view was 1. 7 degrees. Comments "occluded right femoral vein". Patient outcome: the patient remains in the clinical study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4). Igtcfs-65-1-fem-celect-pt. (b)(4). Summary of investigational findings: insignificant tilt is noted on the imaging. Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature. Filter tilt may happen during placement or during implanting period. The root cause for the tilt cannot be determined based on the available information. No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e. G. Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava. Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.
 
Event Description
Description of event according to study: on (b)(6) 2015: the inferior vena cava (ivc) diameter at the intended filter location was 24. 0 mm. There was no ivc anatomic anomaly or presence of thrombus in the ivc prior to filter placement. Using the right common femoral vein as the access site, a celect filter (lot # e3342374) was deployed at the intended location in the ivc infrarenal site and in a location suitable to provide sufficient mechanical protection against pulmonary embolism (pe). The filter neither deployed prematurely nor did the filter jump upon deployment. There was no evidence of filter fracture, deformation, or migration. There was no extravasation of contrast or filter leg(s) appearing outside the column of contrast after filter placement. From the venacavagram, the angle of filter tilt was >
=
16 degrees. Site report of tilt per post-procedure x-ray ((b)(6) 2015) was 0 degrees. Analysis of the placement procedure venacavagram revealed suboptimal image, unable to provide measurements. There was no ivc anatomic anomaly. Presence of thrombus in the ivc prior to filter placement was unable to be determined. There was thrombus present in the pelvic veins on the right side. The filter placement site was the infrarenal. There was no evidence extravasation of contrast, or deformation. Filter leg(s) did appear outside the column of contrast after filter placement. From the venacavagram, the angle of filter tilt in the ap view was 1. 7 degrees. Comments "included right femoral vein". Patient outcome: the patient remains in the clinical study.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand NameCOOK CELECT® PLATINUM NAVALIGN FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of DeviceDTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
4632 bjaeverskov
DA
Manufacturer Contact
marianne hoey
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA   4632
56868686
MDR Report Key5696739
MDR Text Key47747775
Report Number3002808486-2016-00400
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121629
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type study
Reporter Occupation
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/03/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-1-FEM-CELECT-PT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA?
Event Location No Information
Date Manufacturer Received05/12/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Answer Provided
Date Device Manufactured06/24/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial

Patient Treatment Data
Date Received: 06/03/2016 Patient Sequence Number: 1
-
-