• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BETTLACH 5.0MM FLEXIBLE SHAFT; REAMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BETTLACH 5.0MM FLEXIBLE SHAFT; REAMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 352.040
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 05/24/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient identifier and weight are unknown.The patient¿s exact age is unknown; however, age was reported as being in the (b)(6).(b)(4).Device is an instrument and is not implanted or explanted.It is unknown at this time if the complainant part will be returned for evaluation.(b)(6).Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned.Without a lot number, the device history record review could not be requested.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in the (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that a patient underwent a tibial and femoral nailing procedure on (b)(6) 2016 in order to address a diagnosis of floating knee.During the procedure, the surgeon noted that the patient had a very narrow intramedullary canal in both the femur and the tibia.Upon first reaming of the tibia, the head of an 8.5mm reamer head sheared into two (2) pieces.As the reamer head broke, it took some of the engagement splines off of the end of the reamer shaft as well.The reamer shaft was withdrawn.An intra-operative x-ray confirmed the presence of retained fragments; pieces of the head and the tip of the shaft remained in the patient.Reaming was completed with a second set that was on-hand.The implantable nail was then inserted past the debris, thus completing the surgery with a five (5) minute prolongation.This report is 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was confirmed that the procedure was successfully completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product investigation summary: all (b)(4) prongs at the forefront of the received flexible shaft are sheared off.(b)(4) of the prongs were sent back for evaluation.All of them were badly twisted before breaking off.The device is in a very used overall condition with the laser etching faded.Also, there are strong tool marks at the top hexagon, strong stress marks all over the shaft, and the hexagon at the forefront is totally worn.Due to the damage at the forefront of the device, the relevant dimensions could not be verified.The review of the manufacturing documents has shown that the device was manufactured according to the specifications with a lot size of (b)(4) pieces.The documents show that, with stainless steel (b)(4), the correct material was used for the coupling.The hardness of this lot was between (b)(4) hv 0.5, which is within the specifications of (b)(4) +/-20 hv 0.5 according to the drawing.These findings, along with the very used condition of the device, indicate that the device was often used without any prior issues.Afterwards, it cannot be defined if the hexagon of the reamer coupling was already worn before the procedure or if this occurred during the procedure.There sheared off appearance of the fracture face and the strongly twisted prongs are an indication for a mechanical overload during reaming.Device history record review: manufacturing site: (b)(6) - manufacturing date: march 23, 2011.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
5.0MM FLEXIBLE SHAFT
Type of Device
REAMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach PA CH254 4
SZ  CH2544
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach CH254 4
SZ   CH2544
Manufacturer Contact
terry callahan
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5705359
MDR Text Key46769693
Report Number2520274-2016-13054
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PEXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/31/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/08/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number352.040
Device Lot Number2707520
Other Device ID Number(01)07611819243668(10)2707520
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/26/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/26/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-