The device has not been returned for evaluation; however, return is anticipated.Without return of the device, no definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the clinical observation.Should the device be returned or additional information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.Information received from the same report as mfr: 2029214-2016-00412.
|
The pipeline flex pushwire and the microcatheter were returned for evaluation.It appeared that the pipeline flex pushwire was detached at the hypotube proximal to the wire weld.The detached distal segment of the pushwire and pipeline braid were found outside of the catheter.The remaining segment of the pushwire was found inside of the microcatheter.The catheter body was found to be accordioned.For further examination, the remaining segment of the pushwire was then pushed out of the catheter lumen with difficulty.The distal hypotube appeared to be stretched with the ptfe shrink tubing still intact.The pipeline braid was returned detached from the pushwire; therefore, the distal and proximal ends of the braid were unable to be identified.The pipeline braid was found fully opened with moderately fraying at both ends.The pushwire was observed to be bent.No other anomalies were observed.The surfaces of the detached pushwire were sent out for scanning electron micrographic (sem) / energy dispersive spectroscopy (eds) analyses.Based on the reported event details, the analysis findings and the sem/eds analyses, the clinical observation was confirmed.We are unable to definitively determine the cause of the reported experience.The elemental analysis conducted through scanning electron micrographic (sem) / energy dispersive spectroscopy (eds) showed presence of soldering material (tin); thereby indicating that the soldering was conducted.In addition, a review of the manufacturing process did not uncover any deficiencies with regard to the soldering process.However, the damages observed on the pushwire proximal wire, pipeline braid, hypotube and catheter body suggest excessive force such as pushing and pulling.It is possible that the ¿moderate vessel tortuosity¿ may have contributed to the ¿gradual resistance¿; subsequently causing the devices to become damaged and detached.However, the cause for the resistance could not be determined.In this event, the user context may have contributed to the reported issues as the physician continued to advance the pipeline flex delivery system despite of the resistance.Per our instructions for use, the user should "discontinue delivery of the device if high force or excessive friction is encountered.Identify the cause of the resistance and remove device and microcatheter simultaneously.Advancement of the ped against resistance may result in device damage or patient injury.All products are 100% inspected for damage and irregularities during manufacture.
|