It was reported on (b)(6) 2016 that the patient had a prophylactic generator replacement that day.The patient was implanted with a m106 and systems diagnostics were normal with impedance of 2405 ohms with the new generator in the or.However, in the operating room (or) the patient's heartbeat was unable to be detected.All sensitivity settings were tried, but only ????s were observed.The surgeon had declined to do the ekg surface assessment.They did not replace the generator but just programmed it on to the same settings as the explanted 102.The design history records was reviewed and the generator passed all functional tests.R-wave verification passed prior to distribution as well.All testing (final r-wave twice, pcba level r-wave, and the sso sensing delay/leakage current tests) show that this device had the ability to sense within its specification in manufacturing.It was confirmed that the generator and lead electrodes were implanted very close to each other in a single incision fashion.The patient was seen for post-op appointment on (b)(6) 2016.Heartbeat detection was again tried but only ???? at settings 1-4 were seen.At setting 5 there were able to intermittently detect a heartrate at times (maybe 30-40% of the time).This heartrate was very erratic.It was over 200 bpm, around 89-91 bpm, and also around 45-50 bpm at different times.The patient's pulse was around 90.Since the hr detection was intermittent and inconsistent, the physician decided to leave the autostim current off (0.0ma).He did leave tachycardia detection on at a sensitivity of 5 with a 40% threshold.His thought was to capture the data on what the device was detecting.The patient's device is currently programmed with an off time of 0.5 min and this has been very effective for her.
|