• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Tachycardia (2095)
Event Date 06/14/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported on (b)(6) 2016 that the patient had a prophylactic generator replacement that day.The patient was implanted with a m106 and systems diagnostics were normal with impedance of 2405 ohms with the new generator in the or.However, in the operating room (or) the patient's heartbeat was unable to be detected.All sensitivity settings were tried, but only ????s were observed.The surgeon had declined to do the ekg surface assessment.They did not replace the generator but just programmed it on to the same settings as the explanted 102.The design history records was reviewed and the generator passed all functional tests.R-wave verification passed prior to distribution as well.All testing (final r-wave twice, pcba level r-wave, and the sso sensing delay/leakage current tests) show that this device had the ability to sense within its specification in manufacturing.It was confirmed that the generator and lead electrodes were implanted very close to each other in a single incision fashion.The patient was seen for post-op appointment on (b)(6) 2016.Heartbeat detection was again tried but only ???? at settings 1-4 were seen.At setting 5 there were able to intermittently detect a heartrate at times (maybe 30-40% of the time).This heartrate was very erratic.It was over 200 bpm, around 89-91 bpm, and also around 45-50 bpm at different times.The patient's pulse was around 90.Since the hr detection was intermittent and inconsistent, the physician decided to leave the autostim current off (0.0ma).He did leave tachycardia detection on at a sensitivity of 5 with a 40% threshold.His thought was to capture the data on what the device was detecting.The patient's device is currently programmed with an off time of 0.5 min and this has been very effective for her.
 
Event Description
The patient had a follow-up appointment on (b)(6) 2016.A 2-position assessment was done for the generator site.R-waves while standing were barely discernible with < 0.2v amplitude.R-waves while the patient was laying on her left were 0.1-0.2v magnitude, still significantly less than 0.4v.Conclusion of the assessment was that inadequate r-wave amplitudes are present based on the implant location.The alternate placement measured at the axilla would be a good choice for a future replacement device if autostimulation mode is needed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5777706
MDR Text Key49762933
Report Number1644487-2016-01532
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/14/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/07/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/20/2017
Device Model Number106
Device Lot Number203494
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/02/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age58 YR
-
-