A variance between inratio inr results was reported in (b)(6).The results were as follows: 1.2 and 2.1 with the same patient on the same day; exact date unknown; therapeutic range unknown.It was reported that the monitor had been moved during testing, the wrong lancet size was used and the finger stick was performed too early.No further information is available.(note: the inratio2 product 99008g1 is not available in the united states; however, this mdr filing is due to a same or similar device being available in the united states.).
|
It is indicated that the product is not returning for evaluation.Since the product associated with the complaint was not returned, in-house testing was performed on the reported lot number.The customer's complaint was not confirmed during in-house testing.In-house testing on the reported strip lot met expectations.The product performed as expected.The manufacturing records for the lot were reviewed and the lot met release specifications.Improper techniques and user issues were identified in the complaint.These could not be ruled out as a cause of the unexpected results.Based on the information available, there is no indication of a product deficiency.No corrective action is required at this time.
|