• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 103
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 06/01/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Clinic notes were received for a patient¿s generator replacement referral.It was reported in the notes that the patient was experiencing painful stimulation and the feeling like the device was ¿cycling rapidly¿.The notes provide the impedance when checked on (b)(6) 2016 to be within normal limits.It was stated that x-rays showed no indication of a fractured lead.The device was disabled during a visit to the er in the beginning of (b)(6) 2016 and a new medication was added.It was noted the patient has previously failed several aed¿s or had side effects from them.Additional information has not been received to-date.No known surgery has occurred to-date.
 
Event Description
Revision surgery occurred on (b)(6) 2016.The company representative who attended the surgery provided that after speaking with the patient had been experiencing the pain for the past few months.Lead impedance was within normal limits pre-operatively.During surgery the surgeon inspected the lead and said it was corroded.A full revision was performed and upon removing the lead he noticed that a suture had been pushed through the lead.The explanted generator has not been received by the manufacturer to-date.
 
Event Description
The explanted devices were received for product analysis on 09/28/2016.Analysis was completed on the returned lead portions 10/11/2016.During the visual analysis a suture was observed sewn through a tie down and outer silicone tubing approximately 266mm from the end of the silicone tubes.The suture did not appear to have penetrated the inner silicone tube.The incision mark and the suture sewn through the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing.For the observed inner tubing fluid remnants, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends that were made during the explanted process.The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted except for the suture sewn through the outer silicone tubing.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.Analysis was completed for the returned generator 10/18/2016.The septum was not cored.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the pulse generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generatoroutput signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The battery measured 2.983 volts and shows the intensified follow-up indicator was not set.The downloaded data revealed that 42.695% of the battery had been consumed.Measured battery voltage and consumed capacity parameters were as expected.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation codes: the evaluation codes for results and conclusions were inadvertently provided incorrectly on follow-up report #2.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 103
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5857154
MDR Text Key51490062
Report Number1644487-2016-01784
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/11/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2012
Device Model Number103
Device Lot Number201534
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/28/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received11/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/23/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age27 YR
-
-