The information on the maude event report is vague and did not include contact information for the reporter.
The maude event report identifies two devices a bard 3dmax mesh and a bard xenmatrix graft.
There is no implant date listed for the 3dmax mesh, there is an event date of (b)(6) 2015 and there is an implant date for the xenmatrix graft of (b)(6) 2015.
It would appear that the patient's reported issues are associated to the 3dmax mesh as the event date listed is prior to the implant date of the xenmatrix graft.
Therefore, this report is submitted to represent the bard 3dmax mesh device.
No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records could not be conducted.
Based on the limited information available and having no way of contacting the reporter or the patient, at this time no conclusions can be made.
If additional information is obtained, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.
Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
The following was reported to davol via maude event report (mw5063263): "reporter said he had mesh implant which broke and eroded into his appendix, scrotum, belly and into his bottom.
" it appears that the alleged problem was reported by a patient to a nurse who then reported this to the fda via maude database.
The nurse reporting the event to the fda did not include any information that would allow for direct follow up.
As such no additional information can be gathered at this time.
|