• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. AUTOCAT2 WAVE; INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. AUTOCAT2 WAVE; INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IAP-0500
Device Problem Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/04/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).No sample components were returned for investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported via a hotline call from the registered nurse (rn) in the cardiac care unit(ccu) to assist troubleshoot persistent high baseline alarms.This is the only type of alarm that has occurred on the pump but is occurring approximately every 5-10 minutes at least, sometimes more frequently.The pump is otherwise achieving the goals of therapy in 1:1.On discussion, the rn reports that the alarms started after the iab was repositioned by the md.They felt that it was high and repositioned it slightly lower.They have ordered another chest x-ray to verify placement.Patient is 71 inches tall, no adipose tissue at the insertion site.No kinks were noted in the line or at the insertion site and no blood was noted in the catheter tubing.The clinical support specialist discussed with the rn an attempt to change patient positioning with no change.The css had the rn decrease the volume in the iab with no change in the alarm status.Catheter gas line disconnected, reconnected and pumping resumed with no change in status.After discussion, the css suggested that they exchange the pump.After exchanging the pump, the alarm did not reoccur.Multiple calls back and forth and last call at 0815 est the patient was supported on the second pump without alarms or issues.The first pump was sent to biomed for examination.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).No iabp parts or recorder strips were returned to teleflex (b)(4) for evaluation.Per the hotline call, the rn was calling to troubleshoot persistent high baseline alarms.The css discussed repositioning the patient and decreasing the volume with no change in the status.However, the pump was otherwise achieving the goals of therapy.As a result, the pump was exchanged.No further alarms were received.Per the field service engineer: this is a demand customer.The account has a trained biomed and they do their own repair.The fse was unaware and was not contacted regarding any issue related to the reported complaint.Follow up information received from the hospital biomed stated that the pump was sent to the biomed department.The hospital biomed checked out the pump and could not duplicate the alarm issue.The pump was returned to service on 08/04/2016.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted for the iap serial number and lot number with no relevant findings.The device passed all manufacturing specifications prior to release.See other remarks section.Other remarks: conclusion: the reported complaint of "high baseline alarm" is not confirmed.The pump was checked by the hospital biomed and no problem was found related to the reported complaint.No parts will be returned to teleflex (b)(4) facility for evaluation.The cause of the reported complaint could not be determined.
 
Event Description
It was reported via a hotline call from the registered nurse (rn) in the cardiac care unit(ccu) to assist troubleshoot persistent high baseline alarms.This is the only type of alarm that has occurred on the pump but is occurring approximately every 5-10 minutes at least, sometimes more frequently.The pump is otherwise achieving the goals of therapy in 1:1.On discussion, the rn reports that the alarms started after the iab was repositioned by the md.They felt that it was high and repositioned it slightly lower.They have ordered another chest x-ray to verify placement.Patient is (b)(6), no adipose tissue at the insertion site.No kinks were noted in the line or at the insertion site and no blood was noted in the catheter tubing.The clinical support specialist discussed with the rn an attempt to change patient positioning with no change.The css had the rn decrease the volume in the iab with no change in the alarm status.Catheter gas line disconnected, reconnected and pumping resumed with no change in status.After discussion, the css suggested that they exchange the pump.After exchanging the pump, the alarm did not reoccur.Multiple calls back and forth and last call at 0815 est the patient was supported on the second pump without alarms or issues.The first pump was sent to biomed for examination.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOCAT2 WAVE
Type of Device
INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
reading PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
9 plymouth street
everett MA 02149
Manufacturer Contact
anne rosenberger
2400 bernville road
reading, PA 19605
6104783117
MDR Report Key5896890
MDR Text Key52779047
Report Number1219856-2016-00187
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K060309
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/04/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/23/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIAP-0500
Device Lot Number0001078912
Other Device ID Number30801902051715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/07/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-