• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECKMAN COULTER ACCESS HYPERSENSITIVE TSH REAGENT; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY, THYROID-STIMULATING HORMONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECKMAN COULTER ACCESS HYPERSENSITIVE TSH REAGENT; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY, THYROID-STIMULATING HORMONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33820
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 05/30/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer did not supply patient demographics such as the patient's exact date of birth or weight.(b)(6).A beckman coulter (bec) field service engineer (fse) was not dispatched to the customer's laboratory to assess instrument performance.There was no indication of hardware issues, system flags or issues with other assays.There is no indication that the customer sent the access hypersensitive tsh reagent pack(s) to bec for further evaluation.All performance indicators including quality controls (qc) and calibrations were operating within specifications at the time of the event.In conclusion, the cause of the reproducible elevated access hypersensitive tsh results could not be determined for this event.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2016 the customer reported obtaining reproducible elevated human thyroid stimulating hormone (access hypersensitive tsh) results for one (1) patient over a period of three (3) months on the laboratory's unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system serial number (b)(4).The patient was tested on (b)(6) 2016 and an elevated access hypersensitive tsh result was obtained.The customer noted that previously the patient had access hypersensitive tsh results within the normal reference range of the assay.On (b)(6) 2016 the patient was tested again using the access hypersensitive tsh assay on the same unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system and another elevated result, above the normal reference range of the assay, was obtained.The patient was retested the next day, (b)(6) 2016, at an alternate location using a unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system (serial number not provided) and an elevated result was also obtained.The same patient was tested again on (b)(6) 2016, at the same alternate location, using the unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system (serial number not provided) and another elevated access hypersensitive tsh result, above the normal reference range of the assay, was obtained.Then on (b)(6) 2016 the same patient was tested at a third location using another unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system (serial number 604368) and an elevated access hypersensitive tsh result, above the normal reference range of the assay, was obtained.On (b)(6) 2016 the customer reanalyzed the patient's (b)(6) 2016 sample on the original unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system and obtained an elevated access hypersensitive tsh result above the normal reference range of the assay.This same sample was also reanalyzed at the third location using unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system serial number (b)(4) and an access hypersensitive tsh result within the normal reference range of the assay was obtained.This same sample was also analyzed on an alternate methodology (abbott architect) which produced a much lower discordant thyroid stimulating hormone (tsh) result.The same day, another sample from the patient in question was tested for access hypersensitive tsh on the original unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system and a result above the normal reference range of the assay was obtained.This same sample was then analyzed at the third location using unicel dxi 800 immunoassay system serial number (b)(4) and a lower result within the normal reference range of the assay was obtained.This sample was also analyzed on an alternate methodology (abbott architect) which produced a lower discordant tsh result.The elevated access hypersensitive tsh results were released from the laboratory.As a result of the elevated access hypersensitive tsh results obtained the patient's treatment was changed.The customer noted that the patient was administered treatment over an extended period of time.The exact type of treatment is unknown.System performance indicators such as assay quality controls (qc) and calibrations were performing within the laboratory's established ranges and the assay's performance specifications.There were no reports of issues with hardware, system flags or issues with other assays.The patient's samples were collected in 13x100mm collection tubes without an additive and with a gel separator.The samples were centrifuged for eight (8) to ten (10) minutes at 3,500 rpm (revolutions per minute) at a temperature of 25 degrees celsius.There were no reports of sample integrity issues in conjunction with this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCESS HYPERSENSITIVE TSH REAGENT
Type of Device
RADIOIMMUNOASSAY, THYROID-STIMULATING HORMONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECKMAN COULTER
1000 lake hazeltine drive
chaska MN 55318
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECKMAN COULTER
1000 lake hazeltine drive
chaska MN 55318
Manufacturer Contact
angela kilian
1000 lake hazeltine drive
chaska, MN 55318
9523681330
MDR Report Key5910783
MDR Text Key53386508
Report Number2122870-2016-00415
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JLW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K042281
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/03/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/29/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2016
Device Catalogue Number33820
Device Lot Number533451
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-