• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300 Back to Search Results
Model Number 300-20
Device Problems Premature Discharge of Battery (1057); Corroded (1131); Fracture (1260); High impedance (1291); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem Seizures (2063)
Event Date 06/02/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A call was received from the patient's mother indicating that the patient was experiencing an increase in seizures.While visiting the patient's physician it was noted that "there was an issue and that it (the patient's generator) was not functioning properly and that the result would be that the battery would be drained quickly." the mother also inquired about finding a surgeon that was performing vns surgeries in their area.The high impedance was identified on (b)(6) 2016, and there was low output current as well.It was unknown if the patient experienced any trauma or manipulation.X-rays were not performed.No surgical intervention has occurred to date.
 
Event Description
The patient had full revision surgery on (b)(6) 2016 due to the high impedance.The lead pin was re-inserted into the existing generator, but the high impedance did not resolve.It was observed that the lead was broken.Both the generator and lead were discarded, so no analysis could be performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Follow-up report #1 inadvertently reported that the devices were discarded, but further information was received indicating that they were not discarded.Follow-up report #1 inadvertently reported the incorrect conclusion (b)(4) as the suspect device was not discarded.
 
Event Description
Clarification was received that the generator and lead were not discarded after explant.The generator and lead were received, but analysis has not been approved to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Analysis of the lead was approved.Note that most of the lead assembly (body) including the electrodes was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.During the visual analysis of the lead, what appeared to be rust-like deposits and pitting were observed on the unmarked connector pin surface.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified evidence of rust-like deposits and pitting on the surface of the unmarked connector pin.A definite cause for the pitting could not be determined based on the lead portion returned.The set screw marks found on the lead connector pins provided evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no discontinuities were identified.No other obvious anomalies were noted except for the rust-like deposits and pitting observed on the unmarked connector pin surface.Analysis on the generator was approved.The data was downloaded and reviewed from the generator.The 22.687% of the battery had been consumed.Review of the data downloaded from the generator shows an indication of increased impedance, but the date that the high impedance was first present could not be identified.The device was interrogated and system diagnostic tests were performed resulting in ifi = no.Lead impedances and current delivered were normal for all diagnostic tests performed.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.In addition, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5927365
MDR Text Key54532161
Report Number1644487-2016-01993
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/04/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2000
Device Model Number300-20
Device Lot Number11887C
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/16/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received01/23/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/03/1998
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age32 YR
-
-