• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER; PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number B2060-250
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Rupture (1546); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Folded (2630)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/16/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.The other armanda device is filed under separate a medwatch report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat two lesions with two different devices: one in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) and a second in the external iliac artery.Both lesions were heavily tortuous and heavily calcified.Both devices were prepped outside the anatomy prior to use.No issues or leaks were noted during preparation.A 6x250mm armada 35 balloon catheter was advanced without resistance toward the sfa in order to perform post dilatation of a self-expanding stent and the balloon ruptured.The armada was inflated three times up to 10 atmospheres (atm).The device was withdrawn and resistance was noted with the introducer sheath due to poor balloon refold.Excessive force was used to pull the catheter into the introducer sheath and the balloon tore.Pieces of balloon remained in the patient anatomy.A 7x100mm armada 35 balloon catheter was advanced without resistance toward the external iliac artery in order to perform post dilatation and the balloon ruptured.The armada was inflated once up to 12 atm.The device was withdrawn and resistance was noted with the introducer sheath due to poor balloon refold.Excessive force was used to pull the catheter into the introducer sheath and the balloon tore.Pieces of balloon remained in the patient anatomy.A delay in the procedure was noted.The patient was sent to surgery.Both balloon remnants were successfully removed via cut down procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no indication of a lot specific product issue.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties, subsequent damage, surgical procedure to remove the separated balloon, and delay in procedure are related to circumstances of the procedure.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARMADA 35 PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
EL COYOL, COSTA RICA REG# 3009031392
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5939274
MDR Text Key54309975
Report Number2024168-2016-05959
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K111899
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/10/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/09/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2017
Device Catalogue NumberB2060-250
Device Lot Number30929G1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age74 YR
-
-