Catalog Number 314.742 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/11/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).The subject device has been received and is currently undergoing investigation.The results are pending completion.A device history record review has been requested, the results are pending completion.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reported an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during a revision surgery due to a chronic knee infection not related to synthes devices, the end of the reamer/irrigator/aspirator drive shaft broke interoperatively.No fragments were retained in the patient.There was no reported patient harm due to the event.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device history records review was completed for part # 314.742, lot # 7081940.Release to warehouse date: (b)(6) 2013, supplier: (b)(6).No non conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The manufacturing evaluation results are as follows.The evaluation has shows that the hexagon is broken off at the crossover to the shaft.The manufacturing documents were reviewed and no complaint related issues were found.This device was manufactured in may 2013 according to the specification.The relevant dimensions were checked and no deviation from the specification could be detected.The fracture face is homogenous, which indicates material conformity.These findings speak against a manufacturing related issue.Based on the provided information, it is unknown where, when or how the breakage occurred, we are not able to determine the root cause.We can only assume that a mechanical overload did lead to this malfunction if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|