Updated udi: (b)(4).Device evaluation: model #/lot #, device available for evaluation?, date received by mfr, type of reports, if follow-up, what type?, device evaluated by mfr?, evaluation codes, additional mfr narrative.Upon completion of the investigation it was noted that the he valve was visually inspected it was noted that the stator and the x ray dot were dislodged.Therefore; the cam position/pressure could not be determined.The valve was hydrated for 24 hours.The valve was flushed, the valve passed the test no occlusion was noted.The valve was leak tested, no leaks were noted.The valve was dried.The valve was dismantled and was examined under microscope at appropriate magnification: a crack and a bump mark were noted in the valve casing.This is probably due to the valve receiving some form of impact.Corrosion was also noted on the stator.The cam magnets were controlled.The magnets passed.The lot history record was reviewed for completeness during the release process to inventory.At that time based on the fact that no discrepancies were noted for the products being accepted, they were released to stock on the 11th april 2006.The stator dislodgement of chpv was investigated.The investigation concluded that several factors may contribute to the stator dislodgement.Trauma to the valve, whether it occurs while implanted or at explant, was the root cause of stator dislodgement.Galvanic corrosion could not be established as a direct root cause for those valves investigated, however it was found to be a contributing factor when trauma to the valve was found.Corrosion, when it arises, only arises after long term exposure to csf.This issue will continue to be monitored.Based on the results of this investigation no further action is required.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.
|