Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information is not available for reporting.It is unknown when this device was broken.It was discovered to be broken on (b)(6) 2016.(b)(4).Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device is expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation but has not yet been received.(b)(6).510(k): device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The date of manufacture is unknown.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device history records review was completed for part# 356.821, lot # u112364.Manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: nov 04, 2009.No non conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Manufacturing investigation was completed for part# 356.821, lot # u112364.The received drill bit is in a very used condition, there are strong stress marks at the shaft visible, the coupling piece has strong wear marks from often use, the cutting edges are completely blunt and have nicks all over.The manufacturing documents were reviewed and no complaint related issues were found.The drill bit with lot u112364 was manufactured in november 2009 according to the specification.The relevant dimensions were checked and no deviation was found.Based on these findings we exclude any manufacturing related issue.There was no information provided about when or how this breakage occurred.Based on the blunt condition of the cutting edges we can only assume that an excessive metallic contact or the use of a blunt instrument did lead to a mechanical overload and finally the breakage.In general it is mentioned in important information leaflet regarding reprocessing: end of life of a device is normally determined by wear and damage due to use.Evidence of damage and wear on a device may include but is not limited to corrosion (i.E.Rust, pitting), discoloration, excessive scratches, flaking, wear and cracks.Improperly functioning devices, devices with unrecognizable markings, missing or removed (buffed off) part numbers, damaged and excessively worn devices should not be used.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|