Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-FEM-CELECT |
Device Problems
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Difficult to Remove (1528); Unintended Movement (3026); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Aspiration/Inhalation (1725); Pain (1994); Sleep Dysfunction (2517); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 10/29/2013 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k061815, k073374, k090140, k112119, k121057 or k121629.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2013".Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).According to device history records, based on the lot number provided, there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications or that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G., the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava in the situations described in the ifu.It has not been possible to fully investigate or evaluate this event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2013." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information was received on 12/12/2016 as follows: the plaintiff allegedly received the device implant on (b)(6) 2013 as pe prophylaxis due to dvt.An unsuccessful retrieval attempt allegedly occurred on (b)(6) 2013.The plaintiff alleges migration, tilt, device unable to be retrieved, pain, shortness of breath, and insomnia.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer ref # (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "migration, tilt, device unable to be retrieved, pain, shortness of breath, insomnia¿.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Manipulation in the area of the filter implant may cause migration or contribute to changes in the filter configuration and placement.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period.Unknown if the reported pain, shortness of breath, and insomnia are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|