Catalog Number 1012449-15T |
Device Problem
Leak/Splash (1354)
|
Patient Problems
Air Embolism (1697); Bradycardia (1751)
|
Event Date 10/20/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
Concomitant medical products: guide wire: run through ns, guide cath: heartrail jr3.
5.
The nc tenku dilation catheter device is an abbott vascular manufactured device which is distributed in (b)(4) by (b)(4) although this device is not commercially available for sale in the us, it is similar to a device currently marketed for sale in the us.
The device was received.
Investigation is not yet complete.
A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a 90% restenosis with moderate calcification in the mid right coronary artery.
The lesion was pre-dilated with a cutting balloon and a 3.
0x15mm nc tenku balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was advanced to the lesion; however, when attempting to inflate the balloon to 18 atmospheres the balloon inflated slightly at first, then pressure loss occurred inside the anatomy and bradycardia occurred.
Contrast escaping from the balloon was not confirmed under fluoro.
The device was removed from the patient and an attempt to inflate the balloon was made; however, it would not inflate.
The 3.
0x15mm nc tenku bdc had been prepped outside the anatomy prior to use and there was no issue or leak noted.
The bradycardia resolved on its own and the procedure was successfully completed with a new 3.
0x15mm nc tenku bdc and a 3.
0mm drug catheter balloon.
The physician suspected air was introduced into the vessel due to a hole in the shaft which caused the bradycardia.
There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.
No additionally information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
Evaluation summary: visual, functional and scanning electron microscopy analysis were performed on the returned device.
The reported leak was confirmed.
The investigation determined the reported leak and subsequent patient effect appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.
A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.
Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.
Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|