It was reported by a company representative that a patient¿s vns device had high impedance and was referred for revision surgery.Revision surgery occurred (b)(6) 2016.Follow-up from the company representative who attended the case provided that the patient had high impedance after he had a fall during a seizure.Prior to surgery diagnostics were performed and showed high impedance, and a second set of diagnostics which also showed high impedance.In surgery, the chest pocket was opened and it was discovered that the old generator was implanted under the muscle.When the surgeon was taking the generator out, he said the header was broken and the filter feed-thru wires were already pulled out.After he took the generator out, the header fell completely off.Since the generator was under the muscle, the surgeon thinks the fall may have caused the generator to be pushed up against the bone and broke the header.The new generator was put on the old leads, above the muscle and the diagnostics were within normal limits.The lead was not revised.The explanted device has not been received by the manufacturer to-date.Additional relevant information has not been received to-date.
|
Analysis was completed for the returned generator.The reported detachment of header was confirmed.The reported high impedance was confirmed as well, as the output wires from the header were completely broken.After test wires were connected to the device¿s output, the device met functional specifications.With the exception of the header detachment, analysis of the generator concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.
|