Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Obstruction of Flow (2423); Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problems
Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Occlusion (1984); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 03/05/2013 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction: report is being submitted as a follow up # 3 as this was not previously submitted.
Evaluation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.
It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "device is unable to be retrieved¿.
Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received.
Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.
This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.
Complex.
Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.
No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.
G.
Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Information previously submitted by (b)(4) under reference # 3002808486-2016-01234.
Additional information provided on (date) determined this device was manufactured by (b)(4).
The event is currently under investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2012".
Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.
Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation- no information regarding the event.
The product was not returned to assist with the investigation.
We have investigated based on the information received to date, and are closing the report until further information is received for investigation.
Unable to comment on the alleged injury.
There is no evidence to suggest the device was not manufactured to specifications.
If additional information is received, the report will be re-opened for further investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2012".
Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.
Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
According to device history records, based on the lot number provided, there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications or that the filter did not perform as intended, e.
G.
, the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava in the situations described in the ifu.
It has not been possible to fully investigate or evaluate this event based on the limited information provided to date.
Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.
F.
R.
803.
56.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2012".
Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.
Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|