Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Disability (2371); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 02/09/2010 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the patient "received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2009 at (b)(6) clinic in (b)(6)." it is alleged that patient was injured without further explanation.Patient is seeking punitive damages.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the patient "received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2009 at (b)(6)." it is alleged that patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
According to device history records, based on the lot number provided, there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications or that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G., the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava in the situations described in the ifu.It has not been possible to fully investigate or evaluate this event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information was received on 01/06/2017 as follows: the patient allegedly received the device implant via the right internal jugular vein on (b)(6) 2009 as pe prophylaxis following pelvic fracture.An unsuccessful attempt to remove the device was allegedly made on (b)(6) 2010.The patient is alleging device is unable to be retrieved.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "the patient is alleging device is unable to be retrieved¿.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.According to device history records, based on the lot number provided, there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications or that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G., the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava in the situations described in the ifu.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient alleges pain and disability.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|