SYNTHES OBERDORF COMPACT AIR DRIVE II (CAD II); INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, ORTHOPEDIC, AC-POWERED, MOTOR/ACCESS AND ATTACHMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 511.701 |
Device Problems
Partial Blockage (1065); Unintended System Motion (1430); Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Fail-Safe Problem (2936); Improper Device Output (2953)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/17/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Reporter¿s phone number: (b)(6).This device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to unauthorized repair, which is user error, misuse, and / or abuse.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported from germany that the compact air drive device had an undetermined malfunction.During the pre-repair diagnostics assessment, it was determined that the device was out of specification.It was further determined that the soft switch was blocked.It was further determined that the device failed for check for air leak, check function of soft mode switch (safety system) and for check the power with test bench.It was not reported if the device was used in surgery, or if there was patient involvement.It was not reported if there were any delays in a surgical procedure or if a spare device was available.It was not reported if there were any injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction: it was reported on the initial report that during the pre-repair diagnostics assessment, it was determined that the device was "out of specification." upon complaint review, it was determined that the "motor on the device seized, jammed, and heavy moving." if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|