Currently, it is unknown to what extent the device may have caused or contributed to the reported event.
The medical records indicate the patient experienced adhesions and erosion.
Adhesions are listed as a known adverse reaction in the instructions-for-use.
While the medical records indicate a post operative diagnosis of erosion, there is no description of this in the operative details provided.
Without a lot number a review of the manufacturing records could not be conducted.
Additionally, no product was returned for evaluation.
With the currently available information, no conclusion can be drawn.
If additional event and/or evaluation information is obtained, a follow up mdr will be submitted.
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.
Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
Not returned to manufacturer.
|
The following is based on a review of medical records provided to davol by the patient's attorney: on (b)(6) 2001 - the patient was diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence, symptomatic enterocele and colonic bowel adhesions.
The patient underwent a marshall-marchetti-krantz procedure, abdominal repair of enterocele, marlex mesh graft (bard / davol flat) on (b)(6) 2001 - the patient was diagnosed with severe pelvic pain at the site of the "marlex" mesh sacrocolpopexy and its attachment to the vagina and partial erosion.
The patient underwent explant of the "marlex" and a vaginal vault suspension and enterocele repair with a modified mccall culdoplasty.
At this time the patient had ureteral stents placed on (b)(6) 2006 - the patient had an md office visit with complaints of prolapse more pronounced with standing.
There was concern to pursue surgery as the patient had severe chronic pain related issues and adhesions from previous surgeries.
On (b)(6) 2007 - patient had an md office visit with continued complaints of pelvic pain and urgency symptoms, very similar to the pain experienced since 2001.
Patient has symptoms consistent with pelvic pain syndrome.
Md does not see an indication for surgery at this time.
Patient treated with prescriptions and educational handouts.
|