Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional narrative: describe event or problem.Brand name, common device name, mfr name, city, and state, model #/lot #: the fragment is from one of the following implants/instruments, but it unknown which: part 04.632.640s, lot unknown; brand name: 6.0mm ti matrix polyaxial screw 40mm thread length; common name: orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for ddd; product codes: nkb, mnh, mni, kwq, kwp; 510k: k100952; udi: (01)10705034745527(17)expiration unknown(10)lot unknown.Part 04.632.645s, lot unknown; brand name: 6.0 mm ti matrix polyaxial screw 45 mm thread length; common name: orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for ddd; product codes: nkb, mnh, mni, kwq, kwp; 510k: k100952; udi: (01)10705034745534(17)expiration unknown(10)lot unknown.Part 04.633.282s, lot unknown; brand name: 5.5 mm ti rod 200 mm; common name: orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for ddd; product codes: nkb, mnh, mni, kwq, kwp; 510k: k100952; udi: (01)10705034746463(17)expiration unknown(10)lot unknown.Part 04.633.333s, lot unknown; brand name: ti snap-on transconnector 33 mm-38 mm for 5.5 mm/6.0 mm rods; 510k: k100952; udi: (01)10705034746654(17)expiration unknown(10)lot unknown.Part 994-856, lot unknown; brand name: head opener lateral spread.This is not a synthes device so the common name, product code and 510k number and udi number are unknown.Complainant part is no longer expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(6).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
A product development investigation was performed for the subject device (unknown spine instrument, part number unknown, lot number unknown).The subject device was returned with the complaint condition stating: we have received a foreign fragment like reported for investigation.Based on the complaint description, it was unsure that the fragment was the part of any implants or any devices.In addition, they did not check the devices after the surgery if one of them had a broken off part missing.Therefore, we are not able to determine where this fragment might have broken off.In addition, as no article and no lot number were reported a review of the device history record was not possible.With the available information and the returned fragment, we can state that this fragment in its present condition would not have left the manufacturing plant.Root cause for this complaint could not be found.No manufacturing related failure could be found.Only a fragment of the unknown device was returned.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|