Model Number H7493926238220 |
Device Problem
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/07/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Age at the time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent dislodgement occurred.The 75% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and mildly calcified first diagonal branch.A 2.25 x 38 synergy¿ stent was advanced; however it was noted that the stent was not mounted on the device.It was uncertain whether it was not there from the beginning or it was dislodged at some point.Fluoroscopy was performed but no stent was noted inside the patient's body.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: the stent delivery catheter (sds) was returned for analysis.The stent was not returned for analysis; however a review of the manufacturing data for the crimped stent profile was performed.The maximum crimped stent profile at the time of manufacture was measured and is within the specification.The manufacturing data confirms that the stent was crimped to the delivery system prior to shipping.As per post carton component verification, the sealed foil pouch is weighed and if the unit is not within weight tolerance, it is reweighed to a maximum of 2 additional times; if it fails it would be assigned for rework.This weight verification control acts to identify such issues as a device with no stent attached to the balloon.There were two stent protectors that were returned for analysis and it cannot be confirmed which one of the two was protecting the stent for the complaint device.The stent protector inner diameters were measured.Both measurements are within the specified stent protector inner diameter.It can be determined that the stent protector was not too tight on the crimped stent provided the correct removal of the stent protector was used.Based on the specified stent protector profile and the recorded crimped stent profile, there is no issues to note with the interaction between the two components.Stent detachment most likely occurred due to handling of the device.The bumper tip of the device showed no signs of damage.The balloon body was reviewed and no issues were noted with the overall balloon.The returned device showed evident of presence of medium inside the inner/outer lumen and the balloon wings appeared relaxed which was evident that the balloon was subjected to positive pressure.Crimped stent markings were visible on the balloon wall.A visual and tactile examination found multiple kinks along the hypotube shaft.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.A visual and tactile examination of the outer and mid-shaft section found no issues with the extrusion.The bi-component bond showed no signs of damage or strain.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is considered handling damage as the event occurred without direct patient contact.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent dislodgement occurred.The 75% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and mildly calcified first diagonal branch.A 2.25 x 38 synergy¿ stent was advanced; however it was noted that the stent was not mounted on the device.It was uncertain whether it was not there from the beginning or it was dislodged at some point.Fluoroscopy was performed but no stent was noted inside the patient's body.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|