The incorrect part, 114700, was provided and reported in the initial medical device report; the part provided was that of the device implanted during the revision surgery.The reason for this revision surgery was an infection.The date of the original surgery is unknown, so the in-vivo length of service could not be calculated.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the possible infection or inhibited the patient's immune system.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.This investigation is limited in scope as limited information was provided to djo surgical - austin for review.The part and lot number of the device involved in this event was not provided.To adequately investigate this event, the part and/or lot number are necessary.In addition to the lot number not being supplied, information regarding cultures identified in the infection and the severity of the infection was not supplied.If this information is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an infection that are outside of the control of djo surgical.With the limited information provided about the patient and the devices removed during the revision surgery, it is impossible to determine the source/root cause of the infection.
|