Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Malposition of Device (2616); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Pain (1994); Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 12/23/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog#: unknown but referred to as a gunther tulip filter.Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k090140, k112119 or k121057.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2014." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog#: unknown but referred to as a gunther tulip filter.Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k090140, k112119 or k121057.(b)(4).It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2014." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 03/01/2017 as follows: patient was allegedly treated for history of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombus and claims to have received an implant on (b)(6) 2014 with removal on (b)(6) 2014.Patient is alleging tilt, vena cava perforation, device unable to be retrieved, organ perforation, pain.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date. cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Corrected data based on new information received: ec method code updated.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "tilt, vena cava perforation, device unable to be retrieved, organ perforation, pain." cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature.Filter tilt may happen during placement or during implanting period.Filter perforation of the vena cava wall is a known risk reported in the published scientific literature.Also, published scientific literature describes that manipulation in the area of filter placement could contribute to changes to the filter configuration and placement thereby potentially initiate perforation of the vena cava wall.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|