Model Number PED-400-25 |
Device Problem
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/11/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the article photos, the report of pipeline flex migration after deployment was confirmed.The device was not returned for analysis; therefore the event cause could not be conclusively determined.It is possible that the presence of other indwelling endovascular stents may have interfered with the proper deployment and function of the pipeline flex embolization device leading to the reported issue.Additionally, the patient anatomy condition was not reported; therefore any contributing factors from the pipeline braid and patient anatomy could not be assessed.Per our instructions for use (ifu): ¿after the entire pipeline flex device is deployed, advance the micro catheter through the device making sure not to dislodge the braid.When the micro catheter is distal to the pipeline flex embolization device, retract the delivery wire into the micro catheter tip.If the catheter cannot be advanced through the pipeline flex embolization device, carefully remove the delivery wire through the pipeline flex embolization device construct.¿ salvage of herniated flow diverters using stent and balloon anchoring techniques: a technical note intervent neurol 2017;6:31¿35 doi: 10.1159/000452284.Mdrs related to this article: 2029214-2017-00004, 2029214-2017-00005, 2029214-2017-00006.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received report from literature of pipeline flex migration after placement.The patient had presented with acute onset of painful diplopia.The patient was found to have a wide-neck aneurysm in the cavernous, left internal carotid artery (ica).The aneurysm measured 18x14mm.It was decided that a flow diverter would be placed to treat the aneurysm.The article stated that a pipeline flex (ped) was advanced through the microcatheter and deployed across the neck of the aneurysm in the usual push and pull fashion.When the microcatheter was then advanced over the delivery wire of the ped in order to recapture the flaps at the end of the delivery wire, the ped unexpectedly foreshortened, and its distal end herniated into the aneurysm.The ped was positioned such that it was looped within the aneurysm and the distal end faced the proximal ica.The microcatheter was then advanced through the lumen of the herniated ped, looped inside the aneurysm, and eventually advanced into the distal ica and proximal middle cerebral artery (mca).A new 4.5 × 20 mm ped was then pushed out of the microcatheter into the proximal mca so that the distal end of the device could firmly lean against the inner wall of the mca.Gentle traction was then applied on the catheter, taking care not to push out more of the device.This resulted in a reduction of the intra-aneurysmal loop of the microcatheter, and the distal end of the previously deployed ped was repositioned into a more favorable position.Subsequently, the second ped was gently pulled back from the mca and deployed within the previous ped in a telescoping fashion.The delivery wire of the second ped was then retrieved in a safe manner.Post-ped placement digital subtraction angiography showed stasis of contrast within the aneurysm.At 6 months of follow-up, the patient¿s visual symptoms had entirely resolved, and the ica was widely patent with no residual aneurysm filling.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|