• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 103
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Seizures (2063)
Event Date 09/01/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient cannot feel her magnet stimulation.The physician was concerned her battery may be nearing end of service.A battery life calculation was performed on 12/05/2016 and reviewed on 12/16/2016.The in-house programming history database contained information from 12/14/2014 through 06/25/2015.No anomalies were noted.Based on the information provided and available within the programming history database, the patient's device has approximately 5 years remaining until the neos = yes (near end of service) condition.It was later reported by the patient that she was concerned her device may not be working as she mentioned she used to always feel the stimulation and now she does not feel it at all.She also explained that her seizures have dangerously increased and the magnet stimulation does not have the same effect on her seizures as it used to.It was noted the increase in seizures first started in (b)(6), but in (b)(6) is when they became much more frequent and increased in duration.The patient explained the neurologist was able to interrogate her device, and during the visit he performed multiple magnet swipes which had been registered upon review of his programming system, indicating the magnet swipes were performed correctly.The patient stated the physician increased the vns settings and she still was unable to feel the device.She also explained that normally after a settings increase she would have a cough or irritation on the first day and would then become accustomed to the therapy, but this change in settings did not have the same effect.The in-house programming history database was reviewed and was found to contain information from 12/17/2014 through 06/25/2015.No anomalies were noted.The last diagnostics were performed on 06/25/2016 and showed the device was performing as intended and diagnostics were within normal limits.Clinic notes were later received in regards to a replacement referral for the patient's vns.It was found in the clinic notes that the patient had experienced 6 seizures since her last visit and that she still feels her vns is not working.Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Event Description
Additional clinic notes were received which showed that the patient's device was checked and programmed to new settings, showing the device could be communicated with at that point in time.It was also reported in those notes that the vns was less than 30%.In this set of clinic notes, the physician stated he would referred for vns generator replacement.Additional clinic notes were received which stated the physician had checked the device due to a reported increase in seizure frequency and intensity.The physician noted the vns was non-functioning and the patient was referred for replacement surgery.An implant card was received by the manufacturer showing the patient underwent generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2017.The explanted generator was received by the manufacturer.While analysis is expected, it has not been completed to date.
 
Event Description
Product analysis (pa) of the returned vns generator was completed.Pa successfully verified proper functionality of the generator and its ability to provide the appropriate programmed output currents.The generator was found to perform according to functional specifications and there were no performance, or any other types of adverse conditions, found with the vns generator.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 103
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6236463
MDR Text Key64271146
Report Number1644487-2017-03004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/10/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2016
Device Model Number103
Device Lot Number203044
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/19/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device Age2 YR
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received02/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/18/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age34 YR
-
-