Model Number 2008K OLC ONLY WITH HEPARIN PUMP |
Device Problems
Mechanical Problem (1384); Reflux within Device (1522); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Date 12/23/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigations findings to date indicated the reported malfunction occurred during recirculation and prime (machine set-up), and not during dialysis mode.The user visually observed the saline bag refilling with dialysate during circulation.There have been no adverse events associated with the reported issue.The report is being investigated by the manufacturer via a capa.Plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon the completion of this activity.
|
|
Event Description
|
A facility biomedical technician (biomed) reported that a saline bag back filled while the unit was serviced.The machine was giving alternating alarm messages of tmp and filling program at the time of the event.There were no audible alarms because the audible alarms (when lines off shunt) option was turned off in service mode.The biomed was not able to confirm if the tmp alarm messages were high or low or what the value was.Most current software upgrades had not been completed on this machine at the time of the event.Follow-up information provided by the biomed revealed that the air separator was replaced which resolved the issue.The unit has been returned to service at the user facility without a recurrence of the reported issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation of the unit was performed by a fresenius regional equipment specialist (res) and no parts were returned for failure analysis.Follow-up provided by the biomed revealed that the air separator was replaced which resolved the issue.The unit has been returned to service at the user facility without a recurrence of the reported issue.A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no deviations or non-conformances during the manufacturing process which could be associated with the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the material and process controls were within specification.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|