(b)(4).(b)(6).The device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to wear from normal use and servicing over time.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during an unspecified surgical procedure, it was observed that the quick coupling device was blocked during.During service and evaluation it was found that the quick coupling device bearing was not functioning and was defective.It was noted that the attachment device was blocked and the jaws were worn.It was also noted that the device failed pre-repair diagnostic tests for cannulation, self-holding, smooth running, clamping range, untrue running, and gripping power and function.It was reported that there was no delay in the procedure as an identical spare device was available for use.There was patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|