Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information is not available for reporting.Additional device product code is hwc.Other number¿udi: (b)(4).Due to the intra-operative events, the device was not successfully implanted.An alternate device was used to complete procedural step.As such, implant/explant dates are not applicable.Reporter¿s phone number is (b)(6).510(k): device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.The subject device is currently undergoing investigation; the results are pending completion.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Date of manufacture: aug 4, 2016.Expiration date: jul 1, 2026.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
A product development investigation was performed for the subject device pfna-ii blade (b)(4)).The subject device was returned with the complaint condition stating:visual investigation shows a lot of damages at the surface of the complained part which are result of strong mechanical impact during insertion.The blade came in strong contact with other metallic part during use.We reasonably conclude that the blade was not properly aligned with the nail during insertion; therefore, the blade jammed in the hole and could not be inserted as intended.The manufacturing evaluation concluded there were no issues.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|