(b)(4).Catalog#: igtcfs-65-jp-jug-tulip.Similar to device under 510(k): k090140.(b)(4).Summary of investigational findings: sheath and long dilator returned.Three marks at sheath tip - two of them are distinct as if caused by a sharp object, probably the wire during the reported unsuccessful attempt(s) to insert the sheath.Exact reason cannot be determined, but based on information provided tortuous anatomy may be a contributing fact.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications.Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.
|
Ivc filter placement against dvt by right jugular approach was performed.After the dilation of the puncture site with a 7fr.Sheath (manufactured by terumo), the physician attempted to insert the sheath of the complaint device into the patient's body, but it could not.Therefore, he performed re dilation with a 9fr.Sheath (manufactured by terumo) and then, tried to advance the complaint sheath into the body again, but the result was the same.Thus, he changed the wire guide to a stiff one and retried the insertion, which was unsuccessful and the tip of the sheath got burred.Another igtcfs-65-jp-jug-tulip in another lot# was used alternatively, which could be advanced into the patient's body without problems.Patient outcome: the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|