• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Blood Loss (2597); No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog #: unknown but referred to as a ivc-filter.Expiration date: unknown as lot # is unknown.Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k061815, k073374, k090140, k112119, k121057 or k121629.Mfr date unknown as lot # is unknown.It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] suffered damages as a direct and proximate result of having an ivc filter implanted." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
 
Event Description
This additional information was received on 04/28/2017 as follows: the plaintiff allegedly received the filter implant on (b)(6) 2015 due to cessation of anticoagulation during prolonged left leg wound healing.The plaintiff alleges migration, fracture, vena cava perforation, and bleeding.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Filter type is unknown, due to the time of placement it is assumed to be a celect filter.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "migration; fracture; vena cava perforation; bleeding".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56 unknown if the reported bleeding is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Manipulation in the area of the filter implant may cause migration or contribute to changes in the filter configuration and placement.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.Filter fracture is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Fracture of a filter leg can be due to repetitive motion on a filter leg in an unusual stressed position.Among other causes, filter fracture may be associated with a filter leg perforating the ivc, a filter leg being caught in a side branch (e.G.Renal vein), excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G.A surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and / or procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.It has been reported that retrieval of a fractured filter or filter fragments using endovascular techniques is possible.Fracture of the wire is a known risk in relation to an implanted filter and reported in the published scientific literature.It is known from the published scientific literature that filter fragment embolized into the heart or lung may be safely retrieved.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).Name and address for importer site: (b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
This additional information received on 01jun2018 as follows: pt is alleging migration and bleeding.Pt.Further alleges "an ugly scar".Additionally, pt.Alleges jugular surgery to remove the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Exemption number e2016032.William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of (b)(4) (importer).Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating 'celect, fracture, migration, vc perforation, difficult to retrieve, bleeding, ugly scar'.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Manipulation in the area of the filter implant may cause migration or contribute to changes in the filter configuration and placement.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.Filter fracture is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Fracture of a filter leg can be due to repetitive motion on a filter leg in an unusual stressed position.Among other causes, filter fracture may be associated with a filter leg perforating the ivc, a filter leg being caught in a side branch (e.G.Renal vein), excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G.A surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and / or procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.It has been reported that retrieval of a fractured filter or filter fragments using endovascular techniques is possible.Fracture of the wire is a known risk in relation to an implanted filter and reported in the published scientific literature.It is known from the published scientific literature that a filter fragment embolized into the heart or lung may be safely retrieved.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Unknown if the reported bleeding is directly related to the filter.Unknown if the reported ugly scar is directly related to the filter and unable to identify corresponding failure mode(s) at this time.Catalog and lot# are unknown, but the device is manufactured and inspected according to manufacturing instructions.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No additional details provided at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Per quality engineering review, the additional information provided for this complaint does not change the previous investigation conclusion.Therefore, no new investigation activities will be conducted at this time.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Exemption number e2016032.William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi) (importer).Name and address for importer site: cook medical incorporated (cmi), 400 daniels way, bloomington, in 47404, registration no.: 3005580113.
 
Event Description
Per abdominal/pelvic ct, dated (b)(6) 2016, "stable appearing ivc filter with distal tips overlying the third portion of the duodenum." per operative note (filter retrieval), dated (b)(6) 2016, "ivc filter perforating ivc with filter feet in the duodenum.Ivc venogram was performed.The ivc filter was identified and it was captured.It was pulled into the 16-french sheath and the legs were removed from the ivc under fluoroscopic guidance.Successful capture and percutaneous removal of foreign body tulip ivc filter as described above.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA  4632
MDR Report Key6313403
MDR Text Key66860486
Report Number3002808486-2017-00403
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/09/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/24/2017
Date Manufacturer Received03/29/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Weight78
-
-