Model Number 37714 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Malaise (2359); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 05/26/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for spinal pain.It was reported that the reason for implant was that ¿during a cardiac pass, the hcp inserted a needle 8 times, damaging 5 nerves.¿ this had caused nerve damage and the patient stood to do their job because it was not comfortable to sit or bent.That was when a coworker referred the patient to the manufacturer.It was reported that the patient had been on morphine for almost 20 years and was trying to wean themselves off of it.The patient also noted that they had stopped taking their fibromyalgia medicine.The patient reviewed that as a result of this they would like to program the implantable neurostimulator (ins) to expand/cover more area.They tried to call a manufacturer representative they knew but did not hear back.The reason for the call was to get an appointment with a manufacturer representative for reprogramming.The patient did not have a health care professional (hcp) but had a particular hcp in mind to have a manufacturer representative meeting requested.This event started 2-3 months ago in 2016.It was reported that the patient had a previous implantable neurostimulator (ins) replaced because it would not charge.The patient clarified that those implants did not have the technology to charge and reached normal battery life.It was reported that the patient¿s following/pre-existing medical conditions were unrelated.These unrelated conditions were fibromyalgia and primary autonomic failure which ¿screwed with¿ the patient¿s blood pressure, pain, etc.The patient reviewed that they had most died while in the hospital around the time of the ins battery replacement.The patient had been admitted to the hospital and was very ill for about a week with their blood pressure at 29.The patient stated that they thought they the patient had been dying.It was clarified that with their illness they also replaced the ins for normal battery life but the patient did not make the decision to have a rechargeable device.The patient did not know if their spouse had made that decision as the patient had just assumed that the technology had changed.It was reported that the issue was taken care of at the time.The patient had recovered and it did not appear to be related to the ins therapy but it was reported to have occurred around the time that the new ins had been placed.This had been around (b)(6).Manufacturer records show that the ins replacement had occurred on (b)(6) 2014.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Due to additional information, the event is not a serious injury and the hospitalization is not related.The patient codes (b)(4) no longer apply.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a healthcare provider (hcp) on (b)(6) 2017 reported that the previously reported life threatening event, illness, low blood pressure, and hospitalization were not related to or caused by the ins replacement surgery.It was reported that the patient was in the hospital on (b)(6) 2014 for right hip and groin.At the time their blood pressure was 128/48.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|