• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY SYNERGY II EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING PLATINUM CHROMIUM CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY SYNERGY II EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING PLATINUM CHROMIUM CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493926008250
Device Problems Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Chest Pain (1776)
Event Date 01/27/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Complainant name: (b)(6) medical center.Device is a combination product.(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2017-01106 and 2134265-2017-01107.It was reported that stent dislodgment and chest pain occurred.The patient presented with chest pain.The long target lesion was located in the mid to distal circumflex artery.Two synergy drug-eluting stents were deployed to treat the lesion.An additional 2.50 x 8 synergy ii drug-eluting stent was advanced but failed to cross the lesion and the device was removed.The lesion was then dilated and the 2.50 x 8 synergy ii stent was advanced again but it still failed to cross the lesion and the device was removed.However, after the device was removed, the stent was no longer on the balloon and could not be located anywhere.The distal portion was only treated with plain old balloon angioplasty and the procedure was completed.The patient's chest pain persisted and the patient was kept overnight.No further patient complications were reported and the patient's status was fine.The patient has been discharged.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device avail.For eval, returned to mfr.On, device returned to mfr, device evaluated by mfr, eval summary attached, method codes, result codes, conclusion codes updated.Device evaluated by mfr: a stent delivery system was returned for analysis.The stent had detached from the delivery system and was not returned for analysis.The tip was visually and microscopically examined and slight damage was noted at the distal edge of the tip.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.The balloon body was reviewed and no issues were noted with the overall balloon.Crimp markings were evident on the balloon wall verifying that the stent was crimped on the balloon before stent detachment.A visual and tactile examination found multiple kinks along the hypotube shaft.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.A visual and tactile examination of the outer and mid-shaft section found no issues with the extrusion.The bi-component bond showed no signs of damage or strain.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2017-01106 and 2134265-2017-01107.It was reported that stent dislodgment and chest pain occurred.The patient presented with chest pain.The long target lesion was located in the mid to distal circumflex artery.Two synergy¿ drug-eluting stents were deployed to treat the lesion.An additional 2.50 x 8 synergy ii drug-eluting stent was advanced but failed to cross the lesion and the device was removed.The lesion was then dilated and the 2.50 x 8 synergy ii stent was advanced again but it still failed to cross the lesion and the device was removed.However, after the device was removed, the stent was no longer on the balloon and could not be located anywhere.The distal portion was only treated with plain old balloon angioplasty and the procedure was completed.The patient's chest pain persisted and the patient was kept overnight.No further patient complications were reported and the patient's status was fine.The patient has been discharged.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNERGY II EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING PLATINUM CHROMIUM CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6331681
MDR Text Key67479934
Report Number2134265-2017-01105
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
UDI-Device Identifier08714729839972
UDI-Public(01)08714729839972(17)20170505(10)19253277
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/27/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/15/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/05/2017
Device Model NumberH7493926008250
Device Catalogue Number39260-0825
Device Lot Number19253277
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/24/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/30/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-