A customer from the (b)(6) reported to biomérieux a misidentification of citrobacter amalonaticus as serratia odorifera, for a blood culture from a dialysis patient, in association with vitek 2 gn test kit.The technicians determined the isolate was not serratia odorifera based on culture smell, which prompted testing of the isolate with an alternative method (microscan).The result was citrobacter amalonaticus.There is no indication or report from the hospital or treating physician to biomérieux that the discrepant result led to any adverse event related to the patient's state of health.The customer sent the test reports to biomérieux and sent the isolate to an external lab for testing.A field service engineer was scheduled to visit the customer site.A biomerieux internal investigation has been initiated.
|
A customer from the united states reported to biomérieux a misidentification of citrobacter amalonaticus as serratia odorifera in association with vitek® 2 gn test kit.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed.The organism was subbed and testing included both the customer lot and a random lot of vitek® 2 gn cards.Api® 20 e was performed, as was vitek® ms and 16s sequencing.On both cards tested, an excellent id (99%) of s.Odorifera was obtained.Api® 20 e gave a good identification to the genus of pantoea.Vitek® ms gave an identification of leclercia adecarboxylata (99.9% confidence value).However, when 16s sequencing was performed, a 99% identity match to both enterobacter amnigenus and leclercia sp.Was obtained.A comparison of card reaction results for s.Odorifera against the expected reaction results for e.Amnigenus resulted in one (1) atypical positive reaction (ellm).A comparison of card reaction results for s.Odorifera against the expected reaction results for l.Adecarboxylata resulted in two (2) atypical positive reactions (dsor, cit).Conclusion: atypical strain.
|