• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. CERTAS INLIN VLV ONLY W/SPHNGD; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. CERTAS INLIN VLV ONLY W/SPHNGD; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82-8804
Device Problems Partial Blockage (1065); Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion (2182); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 02/02/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation a follow up report will be filed.
 
Event Description
The reported valve was implanted to the patient via vp-shunt on (b)(6) 2017 (the initial setting was setting 4).However, the catheter at the ventricle side was dislocated and a surgery was performed to relocate the catheter to the desired position at the beginning of feb.The patient¿s condition didn¿t improve, so the pressure setting was changed from setting 4 to setting 3, but the condition stayed the same.A contrast examination was performed and it was noted that the flow of csf was little and the valve blockage was suspected.The valve was removed from the patient¿s body on (b)(6) 2017 (the final setting was setting 3).Alternative valve, medtronic strata was used for revision.The patient¿s current condition is good.The patient is a (b)(6) male, and was suffered from sah.The surgeon commented that the valve might be blocked by something when the relocation surgery was performed.There is no further information provided by the hospital.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon completion of the investigation, it was noted that the position of the cam when valve was received was at setting 3.The valve was visually inspected: needle holes in the needle chamber were noted.The valve was hydrated for 24 hours.The valve was tested for programming.The valve passed the test.The valve was flushed, the valve passed the test no occlusion was noted.The valve was leak tested, only leaked from the needle holes in the needle chamber.The valve was reflux tested.The valve passed the test.The siphon guard was tested.The valve passed the test.The valve was dried.The siphon guard was removed.The valve was then pressure tested, the valve passed the test.Review of the history device records was not possible as the lot numbers are unknown.No root cause could be determined, as the problem reported by the customer could not be duplicated, the valve functions.If the catheter is returned in the future, this complaint will be re-opened and the catheter investigated.Based on the results of this investigation no further action is required.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CERTAS INLIN VLV ONLY W/SPHNGD
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A.
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
james kenney
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088282726
MDR Report Key6364167
MDR Text Key68500846
Report Number1226348-2017-10128
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112156
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number82-8804
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/17/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-