A customer in (b)(6) contacted biomérieux to report a misidentification of a proteus vulgaris external control strain as proteus penneri in association with the vitek® 2 gram-negative (gn) identification (id) test kit.Repeat test obtained proteus hauseri.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed.The submitted isolate was subcultured and vitek® 2 gn card testing included individual organism suspensions on each of the two (2) customer implicated lots (241394340 and 241396640) as well as a random lot, in duplicate.Also performed was api® 20 e test strip testing.All six (6) vitek® 2 gn cards tested resulted in the same low discrimination identification of proteus penneri/proteus hauseri.The api® 20 test strip resulted in an excellent identification (b)(4) of proteus vulgaris group.Note, the isolate demonstrated swarming on tsab agar, compatible with an identification of proteus vulgaris.A review of the customer's proteus penneri/proteus hauseri data against expected reactions for proteus vulgaris demonstrated five (5) atypical negative reactions (off, bglu, proa, 0129r and ggaa), according to the gn knowledge base, contributing to the misidentification.Review of the internal proteus penneri/proteus hauseri data demonstrated three (3) of the same atypical negative reactions (bglu, proa and ggaa).An increased number of atypical negative results can indicate a strain with decreased viability or an atypical strain.
|