(b)(4).
(b)(6).
Device evaluation: result - a sample is available for evaluation but has not been received.
One photo was received which shows the cannula tip exposed on the bottom of the needle cap.
A review of the device history record revealed no abnormalities during the manufacture of the reported lot number 5355074.
Conclusion - bd was able to confirm the customer's indicated failure mode from evaluation of the returned photo.
Without an actual sample, an absolute root cause for this incident cannot be determined.
Once a sample is received, an evaluation will be performed and a supplemental submitted.
|
Results: one used sample was returned for evaluation.
The square cover of the safety mechanism was removed and a visual examination revealed no damage or abnormalities to the "shark fin" or v-clip.
The catheter hub was not returned for evaluation.
A manufacturing review revealed no abnormalities with preventative maintenance, calibration, or equipment that could have influenced the customer's reported issue.
As previously reported, a review of the device history record revealed no abnormalities during the manufacture of the reported lot number 5355074.
Conclusion: an absolute root cause for this incident cannot be determined as bd was not able to duplicate or confirm the customer¿s indicated failure mode.
Remedial action required: although a root cause for this incident could not be determined, capa (b)(4) has been initiated to investigate the needle stick injury associated with this device.
|