(b)(4).(b)(6).Device evaluation: result - a sample is available for evaluation but has not been received.One photo was received which shows the cannula tip exposed on the bottom of the needle cap.A review of the device history record revealed no abnormalities during the manufacture of the reported lot number 5355074.Conclusion - bd was able to confirm the customer's indicated failure mode from evaluation of the returned photo.Without an actual sample, an absolute root cause for this incident cannot be determined.Once a sample is received, an evaluation will be performed and a supplemental submitted.
|
Results: one used sample was returned for evaluation.The square cover of the safety mechanism was removed and a visual examination revealed no damage or abnormalities to the "shark fin" or v-clip.The catheter hub was not returned for evaluation.A manufacturing review revealed no abnormalities with preventative maintenance, calibration, or equipment that could have influenced the customer's reported issue.As previously reported, a review of the device history record revealed no abnormalities during the manufacture of the reported lot number 5355074.Conclusion: an absolute root cause for this incident cannot be determined as bd was not able to duplicate or confirm the customer¿s indicated failure mode.Remedial action required: although a root cause for this incident could not be determined, capa (b)(4) has been initiated to investigate the needle stick injury associated with this device.
|