The reason for this revision surgery was the left ulna component broke.
The actual length of in-vivo patient service for this product is unknown as the original surgery date was not provided or could be established.
There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.
There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.
The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.
The revision surgery was completed as intended.
The surgeon kept the device it has not been made available to djo surgical for examination.
A review of the device history record (dhr) was not conducted since a lot number was not provided or determined during the complaint evaluation.
A search of the device investigation produced no anomalies or evidence of a product issue.
Multiple searches of the djo surgical records and patient database revealed no additional information concerning this event.
Zimmer-biomet was contacted for additional information through an invoice search and reported they have no additional information to report for this evaluation.
This complaint will be closed with the lot unknown pending receipt of additional information.
This complaint is deemed to be non-product related.
No other conditions, root cause, relating to this event could be determined with confidence.
The surgeon reported no issues associated with the explanted product.
Inventory containment is not required since there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|