Additional narrative: event date: unknown.Implant date is (b)(6) 2016, exact date is unknown.Explant date: unknown.Device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(6).Device was reported bent and the patient had a nonunion which lead to a revision.A device history record (dhr) review was performed on part # 464.400, lot # 5921831: manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 01.Mar.2013.No non conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.A 100% inspection of the pending is performed and documented in inspection sheet at operation "(b)(6)." the investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|