BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST 40 PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UNK CONQUEST 40 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Extravasation (1842)
|
Event Date 12/07/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No hospital/medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.
The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.
Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post endovascular stent deployment, the delivery system allegedly became stuck on the covered stent during retraction; therefore, the stent within the vessel was further dilated with a pta balloon, creating room, and allowing the delivery system to be removed without incident.
However, after the delivery system was removed, the patient reportedly experienced native vein extravasation proximal to the deployed stent; therefore, another stent was deployed stopping the bleeding and completing the procedure.
There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Visual/microscopic inspection: as the sample was not returned for evaluation, a visual/microscopic inspection could not be performed.
Functional/performance evaluation: as the sample was not returned for evaluation, a functional/performance evaluation could not be performed.
Medical records review: medical records were not provided; therefore, a review could not be performed.
Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided; therefore, a review could not be performed.
Conclusion: the investigation is inconclusive, as the sample was not returned for evaluation.
The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.
It is unknown if patient and/or procedural issues contributed to the reported event.
Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: - to reduce the potential for stent or stent graft damage and/or vessel damage from the stent or stent graft, the diameter of the balloon should be no greater than the diameter of the stent or stent graft.
Refer to the stent or stent graft ifu for safety information including the warnings, precautions and potential adverse effects regarding the use of balloon post dilatation.
- do not exceed the rbp recommended for this device.
Balloon rupture may occur if the rbp rating is exceeded.
To prevent over pressurization, use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended.
- when the catheter is exposed to the vascular system, it should be manipulated while under high-quality fluoroscopic observation.
Do not advance or retract the catheter unless the balloon is fully deflated.
If resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.
Applying excessive force to the catheter can result in tip breakage or balloon separation.
Precautions: - if resistance is felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter through the introducer sheath, determine if contrast is trapped in the balloon with fluoroscopy.
If contrast is present, push the balloon out of the sheath and then completely evacuate the contrast before proceeding to withdraw the balloon.
- if resistance is still felt during post procedure withdrawal of the catheter, it is recommended to remove the balloon catheter and guidewire/introducer sheath as a single unit.
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.
Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post endovascular stent deployment, the delivery system allegedly became stuck on the covered stent during retraction; therefore, the stent within the vessel was further dilated with a pta balloon, creating room, and allowing the delivery system to be removed without incident.
However, after the delivery system was removed, the patient reportedly experienced native vein extravasation proximal to the deployed stent; therefore, another stent was deployed stopping the bleeding and completing the procedure.
There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|