Catalog Number 1012452-12 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult To Position (1467); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 03/04/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.On (b)(6) 2017, abbott vascular decided to initiate a voluntary field action for some sizes and lots of the nc trek family of dilatation catheters for difficulty to remove sheath which may lead to inflation or deflation issues, [medwatch # 2024168-2017-02310.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo lesion in the moderately tortuous, right coronary artery (rca).A 3.75 x 12 mm nc trek rx balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was selected for the procedure.During advancement of the bdc to the lesion resistance was felt with the anatomy and possibly the guiding catheter, the shaft separated mid shaft into two pieces and all pieces were retrieved from the anatomy.An unspecified bdc was used to successfully complete the procedure.There was a 5 to 10 minute delay in the procedure to facilitate the retrieval of the bdc and prep a replacement device.There was no reported adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Remedial action initiated changed from recall to other-none.Action reported to fda changed from unk to na.Evaluation summary: visual and dimensional inspections were performed on the returned device.The shaft separation was confirmed.The difficulty positioning the device with the guiding catheter could not be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.The failure to advance could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|